The Truth About Secondary Market Annuities

A secondary market annuity
is not an annuity

The term secondary market annuity is a massive untruth that uses the cachet of annuities to attract investors

Secondary Market Annuity myth

What is a Secondary Market Annuity?

Secondary market annuity (SMA) is a wholly misleading label given to structured settlement payment rights acquired pursuant to a structured settlement factoring transaction  [see IRC §5891(C)(2) and §5891(C)(3)(a)] by salespeople seeking to make a profit. 


Also known by the more accurate structured settlement derivatives,  factored structured settlement,  recycled structured settlement payments, or in-force payments. and the misleading secondary market income annuity.

Why Secondary Market Annuity?

While fruits are commonly mistaken for vegetables  (e.g. avocados, eggplant, cucumber, okra), that's not the case with the misleading label of secondary market annuity because it's intentional.. One purveyor of  structured settlement derivatives stated in a video that it uses the term simply because it is easier to say.


While the accurate term structured settlement payment rights doesn't have the comparable Mary Poppins level of lyrical compatibility as supercalifragilisticexpaladocious, it doesn't nearly rise to the degree of tongue tying as one would have to endure with antidisestablishmentarianism, or Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcano


The potential for confusion is enormous, particularly when selling to unsophisticated investors or retirees.  Some actors in the space have added to the confusion by making unauthorized use of insurance company trademarked logos to  enhance the "annuity" illusion.


Why an SMA Is Not an Annuity

Warning! A secondary market annuity is not a regulated insurance product. There are risks inherent with such vehicles that do not exist with regulated  insurance products. There are no rules regarding solicitation of investors in secondary market annuities and arguably secondary market annuities do not receive the same protections as real annuities do. Investors have been hurt, many of them retirees. 


Some actors like the cachet of annuities for obvious reasons, the implication, however untrue, that its a regulated insurance product providing stable income without disclosing transaction risk.

Argument Vs The SMA Scam Label

Either It's An Annuity Or It's Not

Why Not Have a Regulator Opine?

If users of the Secondary Market Annuity scam label believe it is an annuity then  get a state insurance  regulator or the National Association of  Insurance Commissioners to opine. Not sure they want an answer.

False Advertising

If it's not an annuity, then it follows that calling it an annuity could be considered false advertising.

The Corollary

The corollary is of course, if it is an annuity then no mention should be made of statutory protections that may apply to annuities in connection with the sale thereof (as the scam labelers like to do) because it would be unlawful.

Professor Adam Scales Wasn't a Scam Labeler

Even Professor Adam F. Scales, the doyen of structured settlement factoring, did not refer to factored structured settlements by the scam label.

should i buy an sma?

Do You Have a Clear Understanding of What You Are Buying?

While buying  a structured settlement derivative may make sense for some people, unless you're completely informed and have a clear understanding of what you are buying  (i.e. not an annuity) and how the risks differ from a real annuity, you should not proceed with the investment.

Check State Registration and Insurance

It is best to deal with a company that is registered and/or licensed  to do business in your state. 

 

Make sure you confirm the existence of active professional liability insurance that covers any advice you receive. This is critical because of the misleading use of the term "secondary market annuity". The policy may cover advice concerning annuities but advice concerning SMAs or structured settlement derivatives may not be covered. You don't want to find out if there is a claim.

Vacated Court Order Insurance

A number of lawsuits have arisen over the past several years seeking to overturn transfer orders. A notable example was a cluster of deals that were originated by Chevy Chase based Access Funding (now Reliance Funding), that found their way to individual investors through various intermediaries and are at the center of lawsuits by the Maryland Attorney General, the Consumer Financial Protection Board and a victims' class action. Some payments have already been suspended pending the outcome of the litigation and orders may eventually be vacated.  There is a plethora of new discovery occurring that could give rise to potentially actionable challenges in the future.


Investors in structured settlement derivatives can now avail themselves of insurance placed through certain underwriters at Lloyds of London, that provides some protection against the transaction risk of overturning approved structured settlement transfer orders.  Note that defense costs ARE NOT covered! The insurance cover became available May 1, 2017.


For investors, the policy is first taken out by the structured settlement factoring company and then the investor is added, at an extra cost at the point of sale on a pay as you go basis.


Note that this is a separate and distinct cover from professional liability/ errors & omissions coverage. Coverage limits are a maximum of $1 million so that may not be sufficient on big deals or in the aggregate. More details here

Video

Check out this video making light of the use of the misleading term Secondary Market Annuity

Contact Us

If You Would Like More Information, or Have Information to Share

Call to set up an appointment

Secondary Market Annuity Investor

43 Harbor Drive, Unit 309, Stamford, CT 06902, US

(203) 325-8640

These Other Sites May Be Helpful

Structured Settlement Watchdog


Structured Settlement Investments  feed from Structured Settlements 4Real® blog


Secondary Market Annuities on Wikipedia

Or Drop us a line!